ENTERTAINMENT

Why are these pictures of Ranveer Singh? The moral outrage over Ranveer Singh photos anxieties about gender and change that lie beneath the offense

When a handsome man shares some expressive nude photos of himself, for whom does he do it? In our culture, beauty, pleasure, art and enjoyment are considered a part of adult life. So is the answer to this question: These photos are for those they appeal to.

If we say that nudity encourages sexual desires, then perhaps the answer would be – those who need a naked man can be either women or homosexuals. So now the question here is, who has been left out now? I think these are the people who are straight who want to be respected and respected in the society. The morality ruckus that has cropped up in the recent pictures of Ranveer Singh is not about his nudity, but about his gender.

Often advertisements, women are shown in fewer clothes, then there is no special comment on it because it is normal culture. Generally, women are seen as objects of sight and desire, and men are believed to see them and awaken their desires. As long as these sexy pictures maintain this equation, hardly anyone complains or objects. If women or transgenders try to change this balance by sharing their sexy photos, they are in return labeled as slut-shaming, especially by heterosexuals.

These pictures of Ranveer Singh have created an uproar in the views of manhood, femininity and common people. These are not pictures depicting masculinity nor does it represent male power and this is the preferred mode even for older people nowadays, but for some straight and hypersensitive people, it turns the definition of beauty, desire, and pleasure.

On the one hand, they arouse (and incite?) the desires of women and homosexuals, the desires for which so many stories have been written incessantly. On the other hand, they see elites as objects of desire (not as inspirations), and after doing everything they think about whether they should be chosen or not.

With these different types of identities present in this world, the straights shake people’s perceptions and make them uncomfortable. It also reveals a larger truth that the world of aspirations pushes the boundaries of social change. In such a situation, they struggle to maintain the so-called respect for different ideologies. Rights are born out of different aspirations and these aspirations are not merely systematic, identical things accepted by rights or tradition.

The moral turmoil over Ranveer’s nude photoshoot is being claimed that it has hurt the dignity of women and is taking away gender and its freedom. It re-establishes the idea of ​​tolerance towards women. Our women are very naive, who have no desires and who have no will in anything. And they have no right to follow their wishes.

People doing nude photoshoots are presented in a very different way, accepting their reality. At the same time, they are also morally condemned. This type of content has emerged on a very large scale in the past years. It has turned love stories of love, sex, and the like into crime stories.

This content is further promoted through television and it is praised on social media. It is not right to condemn and make objectionable comments about someone’s private life. As we get into it, we fill them with very bad things and make ourselves worse.

Creating a stir of such thoughts is not new in itself. As Charu Gupta’s scholarship depicts the ruckus about intercaste love marriages, the sister-in-law-brother-in-law relationship and homosexual love create a spicy story in today’s India, which never makes any clear or obvious meaning.

Understanding their truth, a lot of interesting information is given. But these people are surrounded by moral condemnation. This language spread as a true crime magazine, with stories such as Charming Stories, in which crime stories are turned into tales of love, sex, and pleasure.

Exactly this content is being promoted through television and social media. Slandering and making objectionable comments about someone’s private life is not morally correct. Because we watch and listen with passion and we also fill these dirty and immoral things in our thinking.

It is not only about the morality of others, but it is also about the morality of oneself – people should look in their own eyes before judging others on such things. Perhaps it is also a threat to our freedom that we do not have to face embarrassment and self-censorship on different occasions regarding our life and its policies.

It is true that nude pictures of Ranveer Singh are not very unique and neither is he the first actor to do so. Before Ranveer Singh, many others including Jackie Shroff and Kabir Bedi have proudly captured their physical beauty through pictures. But those pictures were from the time when the film world of glamour, pleasure, and libido was limited to its own sphere only. That is, till film screens and film magazines.

This thing kept the ‘respectable’ society separate from the pleasures of courtesy. But it also accepted somewhere a world of private fantasies and personal pleasures that are beyond the control and public pressure of society. It indicated that the road to diversity and freedom meant leaving respect behind.

It is not only about the morality of others, but it is also about the morality of oneself – people should look in their own eyes before judging others on such things. Perhaps it is also a threat to our freedom that we do not have to face embarrassment and self-censorship on different occasions regarding our life and its policies.

It is true that nude pictures of Ranveer Singh are not very unique and neither is he the first actor to do so. Before Ranveer Singh, many others including Jackie Shroff and Kabir Bedi have proudly captured their physical beauty through pictures. But those pictures were from the time when the film world of glamour, pleasure, and libido was limited to its own sphere only. That is, till film screens and film magazines.

This thing has been kept separate in the society itself like ‘idealism’ and the hobby of the rich. But it also accepted somewhere a world of private fantasies and personal pleasures that are beyond the control and public pressure of society. It indicated that the road to diversity and freedom meant leaving respect behind.

In today’s time films are an important part of our culture and economy and their commercial sense is very good. Liberal or Conservative, traditional or modern, gather people with such different beliefs in the quest to respect those who gather, they are called Indians. But Pleasure is still engulfed in its politically vibrant domain and breaking its old boundaries and moving towards a different, free and adventurous world.

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Back to top button